Legal Opinion

Saul v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1952No. 38,868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action on an insurance policy to recover the value of a truck destroyed in the 1951 flood. The plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining defendants’ general demurrer to his amended petition. We shall continue to refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendants.

■The plaintiff was Lloyd Saul and defendants were Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Company and Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The amended petition stated defendants were engaged in carrying on the business of fire and water insurance. The policy was attached to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Braly v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Knouse v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Barish-Sanders Motor Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Glens Falls Insurance v. McCownTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Gorman v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Venable v. Import Volkswagen, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Bennett v. ConradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Bramlett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Scott v. KeeverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Koehn v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API