Legal Opinion
Fraley v. Desilu Productions, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 13, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs procured the service in California of a summons and notice upon the defendant, a California corporation. The notice (CPLR 305, subd. [b]) stated that upon defendant’s default in appearing or answering the summons “ judgment will be taken against you for the sum of $250,000.00 with interest”. Together with the summons, there was also served an affirmation by an attorney for plaintiffs affirming that defendant is a nondomiciliary and 11 now is and has been continuously transacting business in this State [New York] with Desilu'Sales Corp., at 35 West 55th Street, New York, New York,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lebensfeld v. TuchNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Bernard Sirotta CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
- Renwal Products, Inc. v. Kleen-Stik Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frerk v. Mercy HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Small v. SmallNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Ghee v. Washington Mutual Bank F.A.New York Supreme Court · 2006