Legal Opinion
Agrashell, Inc. v. Bernard Sirotta Company
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1964No. 63-C-206PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This is a motion to quash service on the third-party defendant and to dismiss the third-party complaint. Involved is the question whether the acts of the non-domiciliary third-party defendant in relation to the State of New York, fall within the category of transacting “any business within the State” subjecting it to personal jurisdiction within the State pursuant to Section 302 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
The original action was commenced by plaintiff Agrashell, Inc., a Delaware corporation, against the defendant Bernard Sirotta Company (a partnership) and its…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Bernard Sirotta Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Temco, Inc. v. General Screw Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966
- Minnesota Automotive, Inc. v. Stromberg Hydraulic Brake & Coupling Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Company, Hammons Products Company v. Agrashell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Fraley v. Desilu Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.