Renwal Products, Inc. v. Kleen-Stik Products, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meter, J.
Defendants Progress Lithographing Co. and the Lith Ink Company were served with summonses in Ohio on January 14, 1964. On February 10, 1964, each served a notice of appearance and demand for a copy of the complaint. The complaint was served about April 9, 1964 and on May 1, 1964, defendants and plaintiff stipulated to extend the time of defendants to answer until May 20, 1964. The answers when served set forth as the second affirmative defense objection to jurisdiction over the person. Plaintiff now moves to dismiss the defense contending that by appearing February 10, 1964 and stipulating to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Pendergrast v. St. Mary's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Becker v. LesnickNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- 16 Lincoln Square Associates v. Amrep Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Fraley v. Desilu Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Kimmel v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1997