Lebensfeld v. Tuch
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSidney A. Fine, J.
This is a motion by defendant, Weisz, to dismiss the complaint on the ground (1) that this court does not have jurisdiction over him, (2) that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, and (3) that the causes of action are insufficient as to him.
Weisz is a resident of California and has never been a resident of New York. The summons and complaint were served upon him in California. Subdivision (a) of CPLR 302 confers jurisdiction over a ‘ ‘ non-domiciliary'’ ’ of this State as to a cause of action ‘‘ arising from any of the acts enumerated in this section ” viz., the transaction of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Stirling Homex Corporation v. Homasote CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Tebedo v. NyeNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- New England Laminates Co. v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Badger v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- All-State Credit Corp. v. Listed in 669 Default JudgmentsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.