H. O. Canfield Co. v. United Construction Workers
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The Superior Court dissolved a temporary injunction which restrained the defendants from interfering with access to the plaintiff’s struck plant and refused a permanent one. Citations for contempt based on claimed violations of the temporary injunction were tried at the same time. It was stipulated that the evidence should be considered on both issues. The plaintiff appealed on the ground that a corrected finding would show that it was entitled to judgment. It also assigned as error rulings on evidence and the conclusions reached.
We are in some doubt whether we should decide this appeal on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Steiner v. Long Beach Local No. 128California Supreme Court · 1942
- Company for Erecting & Supporting a Toll Bridge v. Connecticut River Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Dana-Robin Corp. v. Common Council of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Bent v. TorellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.