Legal Opinion

United States v. Phinney

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 20, 2009No. 2:08-cr-00260PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.

Defendant Michael Phinney pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography, contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5), and I set the case for sentencing. In imposing sentence, I first calculate the advisory sentencing guideline range, then select an appropriate sentence under all of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See, e.g., Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Bush, 523 F.3d 727, 729 (7th Cir.2008); United States v. Holt, 486 F.3d 997, 1004 (7th Cir.2007).

I. GUIDELINE CALCULATION

Si…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. GroberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. C.R.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. United States v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
  4. United States v. McElheneyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  5. United States v. CrismanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API