United States v. Phinney
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Michael Phinney pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography, contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5), and I set the case for sentencing. In imposing sentence, I first calculate the advisory sentencing guideline range, then select an appropriate sentence under all of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See, e.g., Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Bush, 523 F.3d 727, 729 (7th Cir.2008); United States v. Holt, 486 F.3d 997, 1004 (7th Cir.2007).
I. GUIDELINE CALCULATION
Si…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. GroberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. C.R.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- United States v. McElheneyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
- United States v. CrismanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.