Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Nettleton v. Higginson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1977No. 11935Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBakes, Justice

I concur in the reversal of the summary judgment entered by the district court. However, since I believe summary judgment should have been directed for plaintiff appellant Nettleton, this separate analysis of the reasons for the reversal is necessary.

The plaintiff appellant’s complaint seeking a declaratory judgment alleged that the respondent director’s action, in attempting to administer Upper Reynolds Creek District 57-A and Lower Reynolds Creek District 57-J as though they were one district, was in violation of appellant’s rights.

Appellant was a water user in Upper Reynolds Creek District…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. McKinney v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API