Nettleton v. Higginson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBakes, Justice
I concur in the reversal of the summary judgment entered by the district court. However, since I believe summary judgment should have been directed for plaintiff appellant Nettleton, this separate analysis of the reasons for the reversal is necessary.
The plaintiff appellant’s complaint seeking a declaratory judgment alleged that the respondent director’s action, in attempting to administer Upper Reynolds Creek District 57-A and Lower Reynolds Creek District 57-J as though they were one district, was in violation of appellant’s rights.
Appellant was a water user in Upper Reynolds Creek District…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKinney v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.