Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Alabama

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 23, 1976No. 74-532PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

Petitioner was convicted of selling material which had been judicially declared obscene. At his trial he was not permitted to litigate the obscenity vel non of the publication which was the basis of his prosecution, even though he had not been a party to the earlier civil adjudication in which it was held obscene. We granted certiorari, 422 U. S. 1040 (1975), to consider whether this procedure comported with our decisions delineating the safeguards which must attend attempts by the States to prohibit dissemination of expression asserted to be protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Universal Amusement Co., Inc. v. Carol Vance King Arts Theatre, Inc. v. George E. McCrea the State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. California Ex Rel. Cooper v. Mitchell Brothers' Santa Ana TheaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Soundgarden v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1994

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API