Legal Opinion

Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 2011No. A10-1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

An arbitrator ordered a general contractor to compensate two homeowners whose home had sustained damage due to moisture intrusion. The contractor’s insurer refused to indemnify the contractor for its liability to the homeowners. The district court ruled that, as a matter of law, the insurance company is obligated to indemnify the contractor. We conclude that the district court erred by resting its decision on the fact that the attorney retained by the insurance company to represent the contractor in the arbitration proceeding failed to timely request a statement of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Harvey Thomas Smoot, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Nelson v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API