Legal Opinion

State v. Nucklos

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2009No. 2007-0754PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} R.C. 2925.03(B)(1) provides that the criminal offense of trafficking in drugs under R.C. 2925.03(A) “does not apply” to a licensed health professional who complies with applicable statutory or regulatory requirements. In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether regulatory compliance is an affirmative defense to trafficking in drugs that the accused must establish, or whether noncompliance is an element of the offense of trafficking in drugs that the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a licensed health professional’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. SwayOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ManleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BundyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. Ireland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. TroisiOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. LechnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API