Legal Opinion

State v. Manley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1994No. 93-1147PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The sole issue presented for our review concerns the proof necessary to establish that a drug transaction occurred' in the vicinity of a *345school premises. At the time of the offense, R.C. 2925.031 read as follows:

“(A) No person shall knowingly do any of the following:

U * * *

“(5) Sell or offer to sell a controlled substance in an amount equal to or exceeding the bulk amount, but in an amount less than three times that amount[.]

U $ $ ‡

“(C) If the drug involved is any compound, mixture, preparation, or substance included in schedule I with the exception of marihuana or in schedule II, whoever…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NucklosOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. BondurantOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API