State v. Ireland (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFischer, J.
*287{¶ 1} In this case, we are presented with the issue whether the defense of blackout is an affirmative defense that must be proved by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence. We conclude that blackout is an affirmative defense pursuant to R.C. 2901.05(D)(1)(b) and that requiring a defendant to prove this affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence does not violate the defendant's right to due process. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals and remand the cause to that court for consideration of the remaining assignments of error.
I.…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. NicholsonOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. BlantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. Faggs (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. ShelbyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.