Legal Opinion

State v. Manolis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1923No. 18221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The statute relating to gambling contains, among others, the following provision: (Rem. Comp. Stat., § 2469) [P. C. §8926].

“Every person who shall open, conduct, carry on or operate, whether as owner, manager, agent, dealer, clerk, or employee, and whether for hire or not, any gambling game or game of chance, played with cards, dice, or any other device, or any scheme or device whereby any money of property or any representative of either, may he bet, wagered or hazarded upon any chance, or any uncertain or contingent event, shall he a common gambler, and shall he punished by imprison*598ment in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ConstatineWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. GaaschWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. KaukosWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Everett v. RowlandsWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API