Legal Opinion
State v. Gaasch
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1909No. 8064PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Cowlitz county, McCredie, J., entered January 5, 1909, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of conducting a gambling game.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Defendants, Matthew Gaasch and Joseph Stock, were found guilty as charged- upon an information drawn under the gambling law of 1903. The charging part of the information is as follows:
“They, the said Edward Bush, J. M. Bush, Joseph Stock and Matthew Gaasch, in the county of Cowlitz and state of Washington, on the 16th day of June, 1908, then and there being, did then and there conduct and carry on a gambling game played with cards, to wit: the game commonly known as poker, the said game being played for money, checks, credits and other things of value, in a building used for a saloon and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. BeemanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. DennisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Brazele v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by16 opinions
- Armstrong v. Yakima Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Pueblo v. BenítezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
- State v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. HardwickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.