Legal Opinion

City of Everett v. Rowlands

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1930No. 22186. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant was convicted below of a misdemeanor by the violation of an ordinance of respondent by keeping a place resorted to for the purpose of lewdness. From the conviction and the judgment thereon, she appeals.

The first error assigned is in allowing respondent to re-open its case after argument for the purpose of admitting certain towels in evidence.

Appellant is not sustained by the record. The case was not re-opened, according to the record, after argument, but before argument, so that the prosecutor for the city could have the towels which had been identified by witnesses received in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ConstatineWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. AkerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. KaukosWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API