Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 11, 1991No. 1608 and 1704PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
Before this Court are consolidated appeals from two orders entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County. The underlying cause of action is negligence. The appellees Gordon R. Bailey and Mary Bailey, his wife, sued the appellant Pennsylvania Electric Company (“Penelec”) for personal injuries sustained as a result of a helicopter accident and for loss of consortium, respectively. The appellee Maurice A. Muth, Executrix of the Estate of William R. Muth, Jr., deceased, filed a wrongful death and survival action against Penelec for injuries arising out of the same…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BirdseyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Polett v. Public Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Valentine v. Acme Markets, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Estate of Zimmerman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Meyer v. Union RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.