Polett v. Public Communications, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SHOGAN, J.:
Appellants, Public Communications, Inc. (“PCI”), and Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer USA, Inc. and Zimmer Holdings, Inc. (collectively “Zimmer”), appeal from the entry of judgment in favor of Margo Polett (“Mrs. Polett”) and Daniel Polett, her husband. After careful review, we vacate and remand for a new trial.
In May of 2006, Zimmer launched the Gender Solutions Knee, a new knee replacement device designed specifically for women. Zimmer hired the marketing firm of PCI to produce a sales video, which would include interviews and footage of patients who had undergone successful knee…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Drake Manufacturing Co. v. Polyflow, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Polett, M., Aplt. v. Public Communications Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Deeds Ex Rel. Renzulli v. University of Pennsylvania Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Sabo v. UPMC AltoonaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.