Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Thomas M. Flannery, an Attorney. In the Matter of Patrick Watts, an Attorney. In the Matter of James E. Banagan, an Attorney. In the Matter of Harold J. Pokel, an Attorney
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 14, 1999No. 97-8210PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
186 F.3d 143 (2nd Cir. 1999)
In the Matter of Thomas M. FLANNERY, an attorney.
In the Matter of Patrick WATTS, an attorney.
In the Matter of James E. BANAGAN, an attorney.
In the Matter of Harold J. POKEL, an attorney.
Nos. 97-8210, 96-8212, 95-8208, 97-8222
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Submitted January 12, 1999
Decided June 14, 1999.
Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, VAN GRAAFEILAND, and KEARSE, Circuit Judges.
CORRECTED OPINION
2Per curiam
1
The Sixth Amendment's guarantee of effective assistance of appellate counsel, see Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 83 L. Ed. 2d 821, 105 S. Ct. 830 (1985),…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Paul M. Gerrity, United States of America v. Thomas PonchikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- In re FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re BanaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re FlanneryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000