Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul M. Gerrity, United States of America v. Thomas Ponchik

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 5, 1986No. 85-2167, 85-2972PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The criminal defense bar has a special responsibility to its clients and to this court. The defendants, often imprisoned while their appeals are pending, depend on their attorneys to prosecute their appeals vigorously; the sixth amendment’s guarantee of effective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 105 S.Ct. 830, 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985), requires no less. And we rely on counsel to present criminal cases to us in a timely fashion because we schedule oral argument in direct criminal appeals expeditiously.

The defense attorneys in these two cases have shirked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. George Bush, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. In the Matter of Rufus Cook, No. D-217Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Myong Hwa SongCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. In the Matter Of: Steven J. RiggsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. In the Matter Of: David M. BagdadeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API