Legal Opinion
In re Flannery
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 31, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
—Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1980. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Albany.
Having granted a motion by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, for an order declaring that the petition and respondent’s answers raised no factual issues and having heard respondent in mitigation, we find respondent guilty of the professional misconduct charged and specified in the petition, except insofar as charge III alleged violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-106 (22 NYCRR 1200.11).
In June 1999, the Second Circuit Court of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re BanaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In the Matter of Thomas M. Flannery, an Attorney. In the Matter of Patrick Watts, an Attorney. In the Matter of James E. Banagan, an Attorney. In the Matter of Harold J. Pokel, an AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of CastilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016