Texas Plumbing Co. v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ESTES, District Judge.
The record in this case discloses that the jurisdiction of this court is invoked by a second petition for removal. It was filed by Third Party Defendant, Wood-ford Manufacturing Company, after the original defendant, Zurn Industries, Inc., filed a third party complaint against Woodford, for indemnity, or contribution “if it” (Zurn) “is held liable to any extent herein because of the matters complained of in plaintiff’s” (Texas Plumbing) “petition”, jurisdiction being based on diversity of citizenship between Woodford and both Zurn and plaintiff, The Texas Plumbing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fritzlen v. Boatmen's BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Habermel v. MongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kulbeth v. WoolnoughtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971