Legal Opinion

Fritzlen v. Boatmen's Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1909No. 99PublishedCited by 69 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME .COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS.- The facts áre stated in the opinion..

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

On the twenty-third of July, 1903, in a court of the State of Kansas, William H. Weldon, a citizen of that State, sued D. G. Fritzleii and his wife Edna, also such citizens, and the Boatmen’s Bank, a corporation organized under the laws and a citizen of Missouri. The cause of action against the Fritzlens was a note for $3,750, dated July 2,1903, maturing in ten "days, alleged to be secured by mortgages covering described real estate and certain live stock, The bank was' made a defendant upon the averment that it claimed to have a mortgage on the real estate and personal property which secured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Swafford v. TempletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Charlie Gaitor v. Peninsular & Occidental Steamship Company, Blue Steamship Company, and Shaw Brothers Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. American Car & Foundry Co. v. KettlehakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API