Legal Opinion

Habermel v. Mong

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1929No. 5166PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from a decree canceling a lease to appellant executed by appellees Stump and dismissing appellant’s cross-hill brought against all appellees.

The lease to Habermel was executed under the following circumstances: H. R. Stump owned 85 acres in the oil-producing section of Tennessee. Early in 1925 he was persuaded to give the oil lease to Habermel on the representation made by one Cook, in our judgment known to Habermel, that Habermel would at once begin to drill a well, indeed, that tools were being held in readiness pending the signing of the lease, and that if the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Huggins v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  3. West v. Aurora CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Allegheny Oil Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  5. Logan Natural Gas & Fuel Co. v. Great Southern Gas & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck and Company v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Sequoyah Feed & Supply Co. v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951
  3. Cliett v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Allen v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1953
  5. Benedum-Trees Oil Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API