Legal Opinion
Kulbeth v. Woolnought
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 8, 1971No. Civ. A. 71-H-141PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SINGLETON, District Judge.
Opinion and Order:
This suit was originally commenced in the 157th District Court of Harris County, Texas, to recover for tortious conduct allegedly leading to the destruction of plaintiff’s marriage. Defendant removed to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 et seq. After plaintiff’s motion to remand was granted, defendant removed for a second time. Once again, the plaintiff has moved for a remand to state court.
The central issue concerns the application of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b), which provides in part:
“The petition for removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bill Ransom v. Frances Hugh Brennan, of the Estate of William J. Brennan,deceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- H. B. Ardison and Johnnie Wilson v. Usbaldo O. VillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Mahony v. Witt Ice and Gas CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
- Potter v. McCauleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Heniford v. American Motors Sales Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
- Love v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
- Conticommodity Services, Inc. v. PerlDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- York v. Horizon Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
- Schwartz Bros., Inc. v. Striped Horse RecordsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.