Legal Opinion

Los Alamos Credit Union v. Bowling

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1989No. 17613PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCARBOROUGH, Justice.

Defendants-appellants, Stuart and Patricia Bowling (Bowlings), appeal the order of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, the Los Alamos Credit Union (Credit Union) .reinstating a $65,000 residential mortgage and note. We affirm.

Affidavits and supporting documents filed with Credit Union’s motion for summary judgment alleged the following facts which were not disputed by the Bowlings in their response to the motion. Uncontroverted facts must be taken as true in support of a motion for summary judgment. State ex rel. Bardacke v. New Mexico Fed. Sav. & Loan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  2. Reid v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. First Galesburg National Bank & Trust Co. v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Richardson v. First National Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Bardacke v. New Mexico Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sunwest Bank of Clovis, N.A. v. GarrettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. FirsTier Bank, N. A. v. TriplettNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gloor v. BancorpSouth BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERVICES v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API