Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Bardacke v. New Mexico Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1985No. 14937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
The State, through the Attorney General, sought declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent enforcement of due-on-sale clauses in mortgages held by the New Mexico Federal Savings and Loan Association (N.M. Federal) and assumed by subsequent purchasers of the mortgaged property, and for restitution of money collected pursuant to such clauses. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the State. N.M. Federal filed this appeal. We affirm.
The ultimate issue on appeal is whether the partial summary judgment entered by the trial court is improper.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Hopkins Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stephenson v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Martin v. Board of Education of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- V.P. Clarence Co. v. ColgateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Los Alamos Credit Union v. BowlingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Los Quatros, Inc. v. State Farm Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Funke v. Aggregate Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Sunwest Bank of Clovis, N.A. v. ClovisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.