Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Sterling Drug, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1964No. 7624PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTroop, J.

This appeal is from a judgment and final arder of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County on questions of law. The plaintiff in the trial court, Faye Oppenheimer, is the appellant here, and the defendant, Sterling Drug, Inc., is the appellee. Deference is to plaintiff and defendant as they were in the trial court.

Plaintiff consulted Dr. James McCreary concerning a skin disorder on December 4,1957. On or about May 19,1958, plaintiff was subjected to a biopsy, following which the laboratory reported “skin changes compatible with but not diagnostic of; lupus erythematosus.” Upon or shortly…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API