Legal Opinion

Smith v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1990No. C0-89-2150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Following an automobile accident in Mexico, Franklin and Sandra Smith and Verlin and Nancy Kompelien sought uninsured motorist coverage from their respective insurers. Both claims were denied, and the Smiths and Kompeliens began separate actions for declaratory judgment. Those actions were consolidated by the trial court. On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court declared the territorial limitations in the policies were valid and precluded uninsured motorist coverage for the accident. We affirm.

FACTS

The' parties stipulated to the following facts. On January…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Degollado v. GallegosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Mijes v. Primerica Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
  5. Fazio v. Hamilton Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API