Fazio v. Hamilton Mutual Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶-1} This appeal presents two legal issues certified to us by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District: (1) Did the version of R.C. 3937.18 enacted by Sub.S.B. No. 267, 148 Ohio Laws, Part V, 11380, prohibit insurers from limiting the geographic scope of uninsured-motorist coverage and (2) if insurers were permitted to limit the geographic scope of uninsured-motorist coverage, does the limitation provision in State Farm’s policy restrict the geographic scope of uninsured-motorist coverage to the United States and Canada? We answer the first question in the negative and the second question…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Sexton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- Stanton v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howard v. Howard, 06ca755 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State ex rel. Stone v. NormanOhio Court of Appeals · 2024