Springer v. Peterson
Indiana Supreme Court
In this case the Court held, that in an action against partners on a promissory note signed with the name of the firm, a plea denying the partnership of the defendants amounts to the general issue, and is therefore had on special demurrer; hut that it cannot he objected to on general demurrer.
1Opinion of the Court
THE hill of exceptions in this case not being sealed by a majority of the judges present, but by the president alone, a rule, upon the associate judges to show cause why a mandamus requiring them to seal the bill should not issue, was granted atibe Inst May term upon the motion of the appellants. The rule *189having been served and no cause shown, the Court at the last term awarded a peremptory mandamus. At this term the bill was returned sealed by the judges.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Dickensheets v. KaufmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- State ex rel. Otenberger v. HawesOhio Supreme Court · 1885