Smith v. Borden
Indiana Supreme Court
From DeKalb Circuit Court; M D. Hartman, Judge. Action by Kirk A. Smith and others against Reuben A. Borden on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1837u Burns 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.
Action by appellants to recover of appellee on a promissory note executed by him for the sum of $240. Answer in four paragraphs. Reply thereto. On the issues joined there was a trial by jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the defendant — appellee herein — and over the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial judgment was rendered that the defendant recover costs of the plaintiffs, and the latter were awarded, by the judgment, a return of the property sold by them to the defendant.
Appellants rely for a reversal on the assignments that the court erred: (1) In overruling their demurrer to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Brower v. NellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Kahle v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- McCarty v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Woolsey v. ZieglarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.