Brooks v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
Albert Allen Brooks has applied for post-conviction relief from a judgment of conviction entered upon his plea of guilty to the charge of rape. He contends that his guilty plea was not voluntary and that I.C. § 20-223, which prescribes a minimum period of confinement prior to parole eligibility, represents an unconstitutional bill of attainder. The district court summarily disposed of Brooks’ application under I.C. § 19-4906. This appeal followed. We affirm.
The bill of attainder issue requires no discussion here. A similar constitutional attack upon I.C. § 20-223 recently was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. ColyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Vincent Hunter v. Walter T. Fogg, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hayes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MauroIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RamirezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.