Teague v. People & People v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hood
¶ 1 We granted certiorari in these cases to determine whether sexual offenders must shoulder the cost of their victims’ forensic medical examinations as criminal restitution. While the General Assembly has authorized recovery of “extraordinary direct public.... investigative costs,” divisions of our court of appeals have disagreed as to whether the cost of a victim’s SANE (Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner) examination is in fact “extraordinary.” We now conclude it is.. ¶ 2 As both a medical and investigative response to a sexual offense, a SANE .exam necessarily performs dual roles. It functions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dubois v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- People v. Padilla-LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. MontanezColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. TymeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coloradans for a Better Future v. Campaign Integrity WatchdogSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Campaign Integrity Watchdog v. Alliance for a Safe and Independent Woodmen HillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- for a Safe and Independent Woodmen Hills v. Campaign Integrity Watchdog, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Campaign Integrity Watchdog v. Colorado Secretary of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2025