Legal Opinion

People v. Montanez

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2012No. 10CA2369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAILEY.

11 Pursuant to section 16-12-102(1), C.R.S8.2011, the prosecution appeals from the *942district court's restitution order. Specifically, the prosecution contends that the court erred when it declined to order defendant, Aaron Montanez, to pay restitution to Memorial Hospital (hospital) for the cost of the victim's sexual assault examination. We agree and, therefore, reverse the restitution order in part and remand with directions.

I. Background

12 Defendant was charged with sexual assault on a child, a class four felony, and sexual assault on a child as a part of a pattern of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Dubois v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. People v. PaganColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. ClayColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. RobbColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HensonColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. TymeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Teague v. People & People v. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. People v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People v. McLainColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API