Legal Opinion
for a Safe and Independent Woodmen Hills v. Campaign Integrity Watchdog, LLC
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 9, 2019No. 17SC284, AlliancePublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch’s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association’s homepage at http://www.cobar.org. ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE September 9, 2019
2019 CO 76
No. 17SC284, Alliance for a Safe and Independent Woodmen Hills v. Campaign Integrity Watchdog, LLC—Campaign Finance—Statutes of Limitations—Attorney Fees. This case requires the supreme court to decide two questions regarding the meaning of article XXVIII, section 9(2)(a) of the Colorado…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Yenter v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Developmental Pathways v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Gessler v. Colorado Common CauseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Ahart v. Colorado Department of Corrections, Division of Adult Services, Buena Vista Correctional FacilitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Medical Board v. McLaughlin—Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Doe v. Colorado Department of Public Health and EnvironmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Jan KULMANN, in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Thornton and the City of Thornton, Colorado, a Colorado municipal corporation v. Cherish SALAZARSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022
- Campaign Integrity Watchdog v. Colorado Secretary of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
- Rebeca Hinds, Petitioner: v. Corrine Foreman, Respondent:Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026