People v. Padilla-Lopez
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
1 1 In this case, we accepted certiorari on a statutory construction issue involving the definition of the word "victim" within the criminal case restitution statute, sections 18-1.3-601 to -608, C.R.S. (2011).1 Under that statute, the general assembly has defined "victim" as "any person aggrieved by the conduct of an offender." $ 18-1.3-602(4)(a). The prosecution argues that the El Paso County Department of Human Services (DHS) is a vietim entitled to restitution from Nicolette Padilla-Lopez because it was required to expend funds to provide foster care for her children as a result of her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Denver Post Corp. v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Dubois v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. OrtizColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- v. GregoryColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- People v. JuandaColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. McCarthyColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.