Legal Opinion

People v. Padilla-Lopez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 25, 2012No. 10SC832PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

1 1 In this case, we accepted certiorari on a statutory construction issue involving the definition of the word "victim" within the criminal case restitution statute, sections 18-1.3-601 to -608, C.R.S. (2011).1 Under that statute, the general assembly has defined "victim" as "any person aggrieved by the conduct of an offender." $ 18-1.3-602(4)(a). The prosecution argues that the El Paso County Department of Human Services (DHS) is a vietim entitled to restitution from Nicolette Padilla-Lopez because it was required to expend funds to provide foster care for her children as a result of her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Denver Post Corp. v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Dubois v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. OrtizColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. v. GregoryColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People v. JuandaColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. McCarthyColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API