Bixby v. City of Charleston
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Judge:
In this workers’ compensation case, Betty S. Bixby (Bixby), the claimant, suffered a compensable injury to her nose. The Hearing Commissioner ruled that Regulation 67-35 was inapplicable and awarded Bixby 20 percent permanent-partial disability to the whole man. The Full Commission and Circuit Court affirmed. We reverse and remand.
ISSUE
The only issue of merit is whether the trial judge erred in holding that Regulation 67-35 was not applicable to this case.
FACTS
Bixby, at the time of the hearing, was a 33 year old policewoman employed by the City of Charleston, South Carolina.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Jewell v. Pond CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Dunmore v. Brooks Veneer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. OWEN STEEL CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Colonna v. Marlboro Park HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013