Legal Opinion

Bixby v. City of Charleston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 11, 1989No. 1432PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

In this workers’ compensation case, Betty S. Bixby (Bixby), the claimant, suffered a compensable injury to her nose. The Hearing Commissioner ruled that Regulation 67-35 was inapplicable and awarded Bixby 20 percent permanent-partial disability to the whole man. The Full Commission and Circuit Court affirmed. We reverse and remand.

ISSUE

The only issue of merit is whether the trial judge erred in holding that Regulation 67-35 was not applicable to this case.

FACTS

Bixby, at the time of the hearing, was a 33 year old policewoman employed by the City of Charleston, South Carolina.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Jewell v. Pond CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Dunmore v. Brooks Veneer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. OWEN STEEL CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Colonna v. Marlboro Park HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API