Legal Opinion

Dunmore v. Brooks Veneer Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 16, 1966No. 18550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

This workmen’s compensation case stems from a compensable injury, sustained by claimant on January 4, 1962. The casualty was a crushing “injury to his foot at about the ankle,” according to the statement of the case. The limb was surgically amputated at a point “about six and one-half inches below the knee.” The claimant retained full range of motion in his knee and hip joints. He was fitted with a prosthesis and trained in its use. He reached maxi mum recovery on January 24, 1964. The South Carolina Industrial Commission found that claimant suffered a specific loss of one…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Jewell v. Pond CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Payne v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Reno v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Schwartz v. Mount Vernon-Woodberry Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Stephenson v. Rice Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Gilliam v. Woodside MillsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Bixby v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Peoples v. Henry Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API