Jewell v. Pond Company
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Associate Justice Baker.
Only one question is involved in this appeal, and that is whether, under the terms of the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, the Industrial Commission has the power to make an award for bodily disfigurement in addition to other awards, when the injury resulted in the amputation of a member and there is no evidence of any condition not normally present in the case of an amputation.
The respondent (hereinafter called claimant), while working for R. B. Pond Company, one of appellants, in the capacity of tractor driver,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Manning v. Gossett MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Burnette v. Startex MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
3Cited by19 opinions
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Stanley v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Bowen v. Chiquola Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.