United States v. Williamson
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.
The defendants have filed a motion for a new trial in which nine grounds are set forth and urged upon the Court for the sustaining of the motion, all of which have been carefully considered but only one of which requires serious attention. This one relates to the Court’s charge in substance that a set-up still may exist although every item necessary to its operation is not at the moment present. Defendants urge that a new trial should be granted for the reason that defendants were not in possession of a still, or distilling apparatus, set up, within the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CaferoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Otto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- United States v. Forty-Six Bottles Alleged Home Brew BeerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert Leon Guy and Dallas Washington Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Pete ArendaleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Roy Lee Burke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Clarence v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970