United States v. Clarence v. Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:
In this moonshine case Defendant was found guilty of possessing and controlling “a still and distilling apparatus for the production of spirituous liquors set up without having the same registered as required by law” in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5179(a) and 5601(a). 1 His sentence was suspended, and he was placed on probation for two years without supervision. The only issue on this appeal is whether the equipment Defendant had in his possession constituted a still. Or, in legal jargon, was the evidence sufficient to support the conviction? We find the evidence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Ralph Dupoint v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Lee Gilliland, Wilmon Roy Green and Melvin Franklin Pearce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.