Legal Opinion

Otto v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 28, 1928No. 4061PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

The indictment charges, in the words of the statute (section 3258, R. S.; 26 U. S. Code, § 281 [26 USCA § 281]), that appellant Otto “did have in his possession, and under his control, a still and distilling apparatus set up for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, without having registered the same with the collector of internal revenue for the district aforesaid by subscribing and filing with said collector of internal revenue duplicate statements in writing setting forth the particular place where said still and distilling apparatus was set up, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colasurdo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  3. Charles Anderson, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Roy Lee Burke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Clarence v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API