Legal Opinion

United States v. Forty-Six Bottles Alleged Home Brew Beer

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 17, 1930No. 2364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The libelant seeks to forfeit certain property claimed to be owned by De Brook Company, Inc., the claimant herein. The question of fact as presented at the trial was, Did the claimant, at its premises No. 1105 Metropolitan avenue, Brooklyn, N. Y., have a still set up within the meaning of *241section 3258 of the Revised Statutes, 26 USCA § 281. ’

Claimant contends that, if the question of fact be decided in favor of the libelant, the property cannot be forfeited under section 3258.

It appears that the claimant set up on the premisés in question a large kettle which had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. DiBellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  3. United States v. Clarence v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API