Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Heritage

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1983No. Civ. 30143PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TROTTER, P. J.

Defendant, Thomas Heritage (Heritage), appeals from a postjudgment order awarding costs to plaintiff, Kellie Gallagher (Gallagher).

We are asked to decide whether defendant’s statutory offer to compromise, made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998, is revoked by a subsequent oral offer thus removing statutorily imposed cost burdens and benefits. For reasons set out below, we hold it is not.

Facts

Gallagher sued Heritage for personal injuries and property damage. Following a court ordered arbitration hearing (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1600) Gallagher was awarded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Brown v. NolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Wear v. CalderonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Pineda v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Evers v. CornelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API