Legal Opinion

Krinsky v. Helfand

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 13, 1959PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Justice:

This is a stockholder’s derivative action on behalf of National Theatres Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Fox Midwest Theatres, Inc. Both corporate defendants moved to dismiss the original complaint or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Inter alia, the motion to dismiss was based upon the Delaware three-year statute of limitations.

In December, 1957, the Vice-Chancellor ruled that the complaint should be stated more definitely, and withheld ruling on the defense of the statute of limitations, stating that it could be raised again after a more definite…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
  2. Braun v. Fleming-Hall Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  2. Krinsky v. HelfandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  3. Manacher v. ReynoldsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  4. Mencher v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  5. Prince v. BensingerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API