Krinsky v. Helfand
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Wolcott, Justice:
This is a stockholder’s derivative action on behalf of National Theatres Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Fox Midwest Theatres, Inc. Both corporate defendants moved to dismiss the original complaint or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Inter alia, the motion to dismiss was based upon the Delaware three-year statute of limitations.
In December, 1957, the Vice-Chancellor ruled that the complaint should be stated more definitely, and withheld ruling on the defense of the statute of limitations, stating that it could be raised again after a more definite…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- Braun v. Fleming-Hall Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Krinsky v. HelfandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
- Manacher v. ReynoldsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Mencher v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Prince v. BensingerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.