Legal Opinion

Nadler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 26, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marvel, Vice Chancellor:

The complaint1 in this case, as amended on September 27, 1957, charged the individual defendants with breaches of fiduciary duty as directors and officers of the corporate defendant or of its subsidiaries in allegedly causing excessive corporate salaries and other forms of compensation to be paid to themselves and other employees of Bethlehem during the years 1954 through 1956. While plaintiffs’ attack is directed agains a number of compensatory devices, including pension and stock option plans, used to compensate Bethlehem’s executives, plaintiffs’ primary complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  3. Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  4. Braun v. Fleming-Hall Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Berkwitz v. HumphreyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manacher v. ReynoldsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  2. Manacher v. ReynoldsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  3. Prince v. BensingerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
  4. Dann v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  5. Nadler v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API