Legal Opinion

Ventura & Ojai Valley Railway v. Hartman

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1897No. L. A. No. 231PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. B. T. Williams, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The Ventura & Ojai Valley Railway Company was incorporated under the laws of this state April 21, 1892. Its capital stock, as provided in its articles of incorporation, was $250,000, divided into 2,500 shares of $100 each. Of this amount only 260 *262shares were subscribed at the commencement of this action. Prior to its incorporation a preliminary agreement therefor had been entered into between several individuals, which was to become operative in the event that $20,000 should be subscribed to its capital stock. This amount having been subscribed, the necessary-steps for its incorporation were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. West v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Marysville Electric Light & Power Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Fox Chicago Realty Corp. v. Zukor's Dresses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Herbert Kraft Co. Bank v. Bank of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Turner v. Fidelity Loan ConcernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API