Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

West v. Crawford

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1889No. 12894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Action on the following contract:

“We, the undersigned, hereby agree with each other, and the one with the other, that a corporation shall be formed by us, under the name of San Joaquin Land and Water Company, for the purpose of procuring water rights on one or more of the rivers or streams running through the counties of Calaveras, Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin, in this state; purchase, erect, and construct dams, reservoirs, canals, aqueducts, and other water-ways in and by which the water so procured from said rivers, or any of the same, can be utilized for general purposes; to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Considerant v. . BrisbaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Hughes v. Antietam Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. Troy & Boston Railroad v. TibbitsNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Winters v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Christian Coll. v. HendleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. California Southern Hotel Co. v. CallenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People's Home Savings Bank v. SadlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Wheelock v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API