Legal Opinion

Marysville Electric Light & Power Co. v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1892No. 14478PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant upon the following agreement, alleged to have been signed by him and others: “ For the purpose of forming a corporation to have for its object the furnishing of the incandescent system of electric lighting to those who may desire the same, and to provide the funds for the purchase of the necessary plant, we, the undersigned, hereby subscribe for stock to the amount set opposite to our respective names. Amounts to be due and payable upon the formation of the company and the issuance of the stock.”

The complaint alleges that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Athol Music Hall Co. v. CareyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Hughes v. Antietam Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. West v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Red Wing Hotel Co. v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People's Home Savings Bank v. SadlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Charles E. Hoppe, Trustee of the Estate of Los Gatos Lumber Products, Inc., Bankrupt v. Emmet L. RittenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Moser v. Western Harness Racing Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API